Advocates in Chandigarh

It is not at all apparent, however, why a resemblance between the Council and courts of law, bodies advocates in Chandigarh are by and large not subject to judicial review, should have the consequence of rendering the Council and its activities public in the sense of being subject to review. A more useful comparison might advocates in Chandigarh have been between the Council and statutory tribunals, bodies which interpret and give effect to legislation, but which, unlike courts, generally are subject to judicial review. Nonetheless, it is unlikely that the Advertising Standards Council is sufficiently similar to statutory tribunals for the resemblance between the two to have formed the basis of an argument that the advocates in Chandigarh is public in the relevant sense. Hence, for instance, a normative justification for the subjection of statutory power to judicial review, advanced by prominent commentators, operates by way of analogy with the law of trusts. It is contended that, just as advocates in Chandigarh to trust property is conferred by the settlor of the trust onto the trustee to be used for the benefit of the beneficiaries, statutory power may be presumed to have been conferred upon the executive by the legislature to be exercised in the public good.